![]() The review article is by objective standards exceedingly poor as a scientific review of the literature. Some provocative points that should be less controversial after you have read this essay. Namely, (1) How seriously we should take the science in review articles from notable positive psychologists? (2) How seriously we should take claims of positive psychologists that what they do is science- and evidence-based? as well as (3) Why don’t journals routinely require conflict of interest disclosures from such leaders? Maybe it will be useful to readers having the same questions Ido. I redeemed the time and effort by writing a long read. I spent more time probing a peer-reviewed review article about happiness and success, and a companion Aeon article than was warranted. The article was originally posted on Jul 10, 2019. It introduces the reader to some important criteria that will be useful for evaluating other systematic reviews. Does happiness promote career success? Revisiting the evidence. The story remains a thorough review and critique of Walsh, L. During its absence, this article continued to be my most requested one. The archive was vandalized and this article required extensive reconstruction. ![]() This highly accessed article from CoyneoftheRealm, Mind the Brain is back. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |